Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howard v. State

426 So. 2d 1269, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20192

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 400 So. 2d 1329 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 1983·No. No. AO-475·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a trial court denial of his motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, F.R.Crim.P. That portion of the record attached to the denial conclusively shows that appellant pled guilty to a charge of violation of probation in return for a 10 year sentence, and that the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the plea bargain. Our affirmance of the order appealed from is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief through appropriate administrative action in the event Department of Correction files inaccurately reflect a greater sentence. AFFIRMED.

[1270]*1270ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a trial court denial of his motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, F.R.Crim.P. That portion of the record attached to the denial conclusively shows that appellant pled guilty to a charge of violation of probation in return for a 10 year sentence, and that the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the plea bargain. Our affirmance of the order appealed from is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief through appropriate administrative action in the event Department of Correction files inaccurately reflect a greater sentence. AFFIRMED.

[1270]*1270ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Howard v. State, 426 So. 2d 1269, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20192 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

426 So. 2d 1269 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.