Howard v. State

459 So. 2d 1184, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 So. 2d 31
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1984·No. No. 84-806·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below appeals an order revoking his probation. The order was based on the alleged violation of three conditions of probation. Both parties agree that the order of revocation erroneously stated that appellant violated probation conditions (2) and (10). Such a finding is contrary to the oral pronouncement of the trial court. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order of revocation declaring a violation of special conditions (2) and (10).

In all other respects the order of revocation is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF THE ORDER IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 459 So. 2d 1184, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2595, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16631 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

459 So. 2d 1184 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.