Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Howard v. State

Howard v. State

465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 So. 2d 31 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1985·No. No. 83-1793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Howard appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and attempted armed robbery. We affirm upon a finding that the evidence in the record and the reasonable inferences and deductions derived from the evidence support the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress statements he made to police. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Finney v. State, 420 So.2d 639 [603]*603(Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Schlanger v. State, 397 So.2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

465 So. 2d 602 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Schlanger v. State
397 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Finney v. State
420 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)