Howard v. State
This text of 465 So. 2d 602 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant Howard appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and attempted armed robbery. We affirm upon a finding that the evidence in the record and the reasonable inferences and deductions derived from the evidence support the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress statements he made to police. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Finney v. State, 420 So.2d 639 [603]*603(Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Schlanger v. State, 397 So.2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concurs in the result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.