Howard v. State

465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1985
DocketNo. 83-1793
StatusPublished

This text of 465 So. 2d 602 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. State, 465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Howard appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and attempted armed robbery. We affirm upon a finding that the evidence in the record and the reasonable inferences and deductions derived from the evidence support the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress statements he made to police. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Finney v. State, 420 So.2d 639 [603]*603(Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Schlanger v. State, 397 So.2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Schlanger v. State
397 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Finney v. State
420 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 So. 2d 602, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.