Houston v. State

688 So. 2d 4, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 1997 WL 78354
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1997·No. No. 96-3050·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s community control but remand with directions to enter a written order specifying the conditions of community control appellant was found to have violated, in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Gay v. State, 679 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Appellant need not be present for this clerical correction. Bontrager v. State, 678 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houston v. State, 688 So. 2d 4, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 1997 WL 78354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 4 (Houston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack v. State
694 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)