Houston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Houston v. State

743 So. 2d 150, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13658, 1999 WL 821011

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Houston v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 So. 2d 372 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1999·No. No. 99-651·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Thomas Houston, seeks review of sentences imposed after violation of probation. We find no merit to any of the claims of error except Counts I and II. Appellant had completed community control and was not on probation on those counts. It was error to resentence him on Counts I and II. The sentences on those counts are hereby vacated.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part. •

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Thomas Houston, seeks review of sentences imposed after violation of probation. We find no merit to any of the claims of error except Counts I and II. Appellant had completed community control and was not on probation on those counts. It was error to resentence him on Counts I and II. The sentences on those counts are hereby vacated.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part. •

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Houston v. State, 743 So. 2d 150, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13658, 1999 WL 821011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

743 So. 2d 150 (Houston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.