Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.

355 U.S. 424, 78 S. Ct. 393, 2 L. Ed. 2d 380, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1586
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 3, 1958·No. 639·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals of the State of Missouri is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U. S. 521; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co., 355 U.S. 424, 78 S. Ct. 393, 2 L. Ed. 2d 380, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1586 (1958).

355 U.S. 424 (Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pehowic v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad
430 F.2d 697 (Third Circuit, 1970)
City of Fairbanks v. Nesbett
432 P.2d 607 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1967)
Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Lloyd
364 P.2d 873 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1961)
Honeycutt v. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY
337 S.W.2d 50 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1960)
Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad
361 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis
358 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad Company
315 S.W.2d 765 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1958)
Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
356 U.S. 326 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Honeycutt v. Wabash Railroad Company
313 S.W.2d 214 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1958)
Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
356 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Honeycutt v. Wabash Railway Co.
355 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 1958)