Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad

361 U.S. 15, 80 S. Ct. 22, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 262, 10 Ohio Op. 2d 318
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1959
Docket81
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 361 U.S. 15 (Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 361 U.S. 15, 80 S. Ct. 22, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 262, 10 Ohio Op. 2d 318 (1959).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion, embodied in answers to Interrogatories to Jury numbers I and II, that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. See also Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 358 U. S. 31, and cases cited therein. We therefore find it unnecessary to consider the petitioner’s challenge to the Qhio procedure governing interrogatories to the jury.

For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice [16]*16Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. ~

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
234 S.E.2d 779 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1977)
Harper v. STATE WORKMEN'S COMP. COM'R
234 S.E.2d 779 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1977)
Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Roberts
481 S.W.2d 798 (Texas Supreme Court, 1972)
Stanley Barboza v. Texaco, Inc.
434 F.2d 121 (First Circuit, 1970)
Pehowic v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad
430 F.2d 697 (Third Circuit, 1970)
The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman
411 F.2d 365 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Mills v. Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Co.
243 N.E.2d 99 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1968)
Davis v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
379 U.S. 671 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Adair v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
392 P.2d 830 (Washington Supreme Court, 1964)
Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
375 U.S. 208 (Supreme Court, 1963)
McLaughlin v. Eastern Engineering Co.
218 F. Supp. 380 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
374 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Jeffries v. Long Island Rail Road
15 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Perion v. United Fruit Co.
174 A.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 U.S. 15, 80 S. Ct. 22, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 262, 10 Ohio Op. 2d 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-pennsylvania-railroad-scotus-1959.