Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion, embodied in answers to Interrogatories to Jury numbers I and II, that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. See also Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 358 U. S. 31, and cases cited therein. We therefore find it unnecessary to consider the petitioner’s challenge to the Qhio procedure governing interrogatories to the jury.
For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice [16] Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
361 U.S. 15 (Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.