Holmes v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 260 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 10, 1958·No. No. 61802; protests 220320-K, etc. (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of Border Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States (39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 515 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 515 (Holmes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 179 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)