Holmes v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 260 →
United States Customs Court·Decided January 13, 1955·No. No. 58690; protests 220390-K and 225280-K (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “fillets of fish other than cod, cusk, haddock, hake, pollock and rosefish,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 261 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 261 (Holmes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.