Holmes v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 261
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1955
DocketNo. 58690; protests 220390-K and 225280-K (Seattle)
StatusPublished
This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 261 (Holmes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holmes v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 261 (cusc 1955).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “fillets of fish other than cod, cusk, haddock, hake, pollock and rosefish,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-united-states-cusc-1955.