Home/U.S. Customs Court/Holmes v. United States

Holmes v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 395
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 5, 1956
DocketNo. 59829; protest 224980-K (Seattle)
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 395 (Holmes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holmes v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of Swift & Company et al. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swift & Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-united-states-cusc-1956.