Holmes v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 260
United States Customs Court·Decided September 29, 1955·No. No. 59318; protest 214336-K (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of Swift & Company et al. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 258 (cusc 1955).

35 Cust. Ct. 258 (Holmes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swift & Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)