Holmes v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 329
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 260 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 24, 1959·No. No. 62884; protests 233271-K and 237028-K (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmes v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 329 (cusc 1959).
42 Cust. Ct. 329 (Holmes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.