Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10640, 1995 WL 601329
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 624 So. 2d 826 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1995·No. No. 95-2135·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Grimes v. State, 657 So.2d 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (petition for writ of mandamus is appropriate course of action to challenge Department of Corrections’ calculation of credit for time served).

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 661 So. 2d 140, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10640, 1995 WL 601329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 140 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimes v. State
657 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)