Hill v. State

635 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 1994 WL 149696
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2763
StatusPublished

This text of 635 So. 2d 1050 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. State, 635 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 1994 WL 149696 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We agree with the state, and the appellant concedes, that since the records of this court reflect that no mandate was issued in the earlier appeal, the resen-tencing imposed while the case was pending in the supreme court was a nullity.

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 1994 WL 149696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.