Hill v. State

623 So. 2d 1251, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9923, 1993 WL 383525
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1993·No. No. 92-01953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

We find no merit in the appellant’s first point on appeal and therefore affirm the appellant’s convictions for possession of cocaine and delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. However, we vacate the appellant’s conviction for delivery of cocaine within 200 feet of a public housing facility. See State v. Thomas, 616 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (finding the term “public housing facility” in section 893.13(1)(i), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), unconstitutionally vague).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing for the remaining counts.

FRANK, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 623 So. 2d 1251, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9923, 1993 WL 383525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 1251 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
636 So. 2d 716 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)