Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

635 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 1994 WL 149696
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 1210 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1994·No. No. 93-2763·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We agree with the state, and the appellant concedes, that since the records of this court reflect that no mandate was issued in the earlier appeal, the resen-tencing imposed while the case was pending in the supreme court was a nullity.

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 635 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900, 1994 WL 149696 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

635 So. 2d 1050 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.