Hester v. State

140 S.E. 777, 37 Ga. App. 503, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 370
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 13, 1927·No. 18507·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Brotles, O. J.

The bill of exceptions in this case, not having been signed by the plaintiff in error or his attorney, must be dismissed. The indorsement of the name of the attorney on the back of the bill of exceptions is not a signing within the meaning of the statute. Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Blood/worth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hester v. State, 140 S.E. 777, 37 Ga. App. 503, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

140 S.E. 777 (Hester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. State
186 S.E. 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)