Hester v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hester v. State

131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 674, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 476

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hester v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Ga. App. 81 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1925·No. 16818·Published

Opinion

Broyx.es, 0. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense charged, and his motion for a new trial was overruled, but the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the rendition of the verdict, and it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge within twenty days of the judgment complained of. This court, therefore, is without authority to entertain the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyx.es, 0. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense charged, and his motion for a new trial was overruled, but the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the rendition of the verdict, and it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge within twenty days of the judgment complained of. This court, therefore, is without authority to entertain the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Hester v. State, 131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 674, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 476 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

131 S.E. 113 (Hester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.