Hester v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hester v. State

131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 674, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 476

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1925

Docket16818

StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 113 (Hester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hester v. State, 131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 674, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 476 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyx.es, 0. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense charged, and his motion for a new trial was overruled, but the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the rendition of the verdict, and it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge within twenty days of the judgment complained of. This court, therefore, is without authority to entertain the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyx.es, 0. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense charged, and his motion for a new trial was overruled, but the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the rendition of the verdict, and it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge within twenty days of the judgment complained of. This court, therefore, is without authority to entertain the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.E. 113, 34 Ga. App. 674, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-state-gactapp-1925.