Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
57 A.D.3d 996, 869 N.Y.2d 788
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 A.D.3d 995 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2008·Published
Opinion
The determination that the petitioner violated certain provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, must be confirmed (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Grossberg v Christian, 245 AD2d 118 [1997]; Matter of Schwartz v Traffic Violations Appeals Bd. of N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 189 AD2d 876, 877 [1993]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.E, Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 57 A.D.3d 996, 869 N.Y.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 996 (Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
189 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Grossberg v. Christian
245 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)