Grossberg v. Christian

245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13008
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 118 (Grossberg v. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossberg v. Christian, 245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Department of Motor Vehicles dated January 9, 1995, finding petitioner guilty of speeding and not wearing a seat belt, and imposing a $150 fine for speeding, a $40 fine for not wearing a seat belt, and a 60-day suspension of driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Diane Lebedeff, J.], entered on July 13, 1995), dismissed, without costs.

Upon examination of the record, we find that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) properly curtailed petitioner from asking compound, repetitive, irrelevant or otherwise inappropriate questions, and that there is no merit to petitioner’s claim that his right to cross-examine the police officer was so circumscribed as to deprive him of a fair hearing (see, Matter of Groht v Sobol, 198 AD2d 679, lv denied 83 NY2d 961). The ALJ’s findings are entitled to great weight in determining the existence of substantial evidence, particularly where, as here, the material facts depend upon resolving the credibility of witnesses (see, Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, 38 NY2d 391, 394), and testimony so credited constitutes substantial evidence that petitioner was speeding and was not wearing his seat belt (see, Matter of Mobley v Tax Appeals Tribunal, 177 AD2d 797, 799, appeal dismissed 79 NY2d 978). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Linksman v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles
218 A.D.3d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
SURF CITY ENTERPRISES OF SYRACUSE v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Surf City Enterprises of Syracuse, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
96 A.D.3d 1458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
57 A.D.3d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Café La China Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
43 A.D.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Whitten v. Martinez
24 A.D.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Kirk v. Department of Motor Vehicles
22 A.D.3d 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Yoonessi v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct
2 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Cotugno v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
304 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossberg-v-christian-nyappdiv-1997.