Schwartz v. Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

189 A.D.2d 876, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A.D.2d 876 (Schwartz v. Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 189 A.D.2d 876, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated June 1, 1990, which sustained a determination of an Administrative Law Judge, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 (a), and imposed a fine.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The testimony adduced at the hearing established that in March 1989 the vehicle driven by the petitioner crossed over a continuous cone line upon exiting the Queens Midtown Tunnel. Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge deter-

[877]*877mined that the petitioner had violated, inter alia, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 (a) (disobeying an official traffic-control device), which determination was sustained by the respondent. The determination of the Administrative Law Judge is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-231). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Traffic Violations Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated June 1, 1990, which sustained a determination of an Administrative Law Judge, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 (a), and imposed a fine.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The testimony adduced at the hearing established that in March 1989 the vehicle driven by the petitioner crossed over a continuous cone line upon exiting the Queens Midtown Tunnel. Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge deter-

[877]*877mined that the petitioner had violated, inter alia, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 (a) (disobeying an official traffic-control device), which determination was sustained by the respondent. The determination of the Administrative Law Judge is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-231). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 876, 592 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-traffic-violations-appeals-board-of-the-new-york-state-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack