Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
57 A.D.3d 546, 867 N.Y.2d 703
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 A.D.3d 995 →
Opinion
The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 (d) (1) and § 1229-c (3-a) is supported by substantial evidence. Issues of credibility were primarily for the fact-finder to resolve and we see no basis to overturn the fact-finder’s determination (see Matter of Fischer v Appeals Bd. of N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 49 AD3d 643 [2008]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.R, Florio, Miller and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 57 A.D.3d 546, 867 N.Y.2d 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 546 (Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fischer v. Appeals Board of New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
49 A.D.3d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)