Hernandez v. State
457 So. 2d 1155, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2280, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15698
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1984·No. No. 84-647·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We disagree with the appellant’s two contentions.
There was sufficient evidence to support the order of the trial judge finding that the appellant violated conditions of his probation. Furthermore, it was proper for the trial judge to depart from the sentencing guidelines using the violation of probation by the appellant as the basis for doing so. [1156]*1156Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. State, 457 So. 2d 1155, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2280, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15698 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
457 So. 2d 1155 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. State
478 So. 2d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Townsend v. State
458 So. 2d 856 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)