Hernandez v. State

421 So. 2d 1102, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1982·No. Nos. 82-80, 82-81 and 82-83·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Hernandez’s convictions. The record, however, establishes that the lower court failed to state with particularity its justification for retaining jurisdiction over one third of his sentences. We remand to the lower court with directions to either relinquish the retention of jurisdiction over one third of Hernandez’s sentences or to state the justification with individual particularity as required by section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 421 So. 2d 1102, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28199 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 1102 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
424 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Wright v. State
425 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)