Hernandez v. State

425 So. 2d 177, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18482
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 397 So. 2d 715
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1983·No. No. AK-66·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although appellant was granted an opportunity to file a brief in proper person, he has not done so. After having reviewed the entire record we find no reversible error. However, there is a discrepancy between the orally announced sentence of three years and the written sentence of five years. Since this discrepancy apparently has not been brought to the attention of the sentencing court, we affirm the judgment and sentence appealed without prejudice to defendant to raise this alleged discrepancy in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief. See Sanford v. State, 419 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

[178]*178ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 425 So. 2d 177, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

425 So. 2d 177 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Sanford v. State
419 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)