Sanford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanford v. State

419 So. 2d 1188, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21324

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1982

DocketNo. AK-366

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 419 So. 2d 1188 (Sanford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford v. State, 419 So. 2d 1188, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant raises two issues in this appeal from a judgment and sentence for aggravated assault with a firearm and burglary of a structure while armed with a pistol. As to the first issue, we find no reversible error. For his second issue, appellant points out a discrepancy between the sentence as orally pronounced by the trial court, and as recorded on the form judgment and sentence and uniform commitment to custody. Appellee asserts these discrepancies were not brought to the attention of the trial court. The judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed without prejudice to bring the alleged sentencing discrepancies to the attention of the sentencing court in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant raises two issues in this appeal from a judgment and sentence for aggravated assault with a firearm and burglary of a structure while armed with a pistol. As to the first issue, we find no reversible error. For his second issue, appellant points out a discrepancy between the sentence as orally pronounced by the trial court, and as recorded on the form judgment and sentence and uniform commitment to custody. Appellee asserts these discrepancies were not brought to the attention of the trial court. The judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed without prejudice to bring the alleged sentencing discrepancies to the attention of the sentencing court in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 So. 2d 1188, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack