Hernandez v. State
431 So. 2d 670, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 397 So. 2d 715 →
Opinion
The convictions are affirmed (see Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.1983); Washington v. State, 419 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Sapp v. State, 411 So.2d 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) on joint possession and induced error). This affirmance shall be without prejudice to the appellant Hernandez filing a 3.850 motion questioning the effectiveness of trial counsel. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Rauso v. State, 425 So.2d 618, 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. State, 431 So. 2d 670, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20761 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
431 So. 2d 670 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rauso v. State
425 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Knight v. State
394 So. 2d 997 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Sapp v. State
411 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Barber
301 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Brown v. State
428 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Washington v. State
419 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)