Henderson v. State

596 So. 2d 774, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3913, 1992 WL 67929
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1992·No. No. 91-2146·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed against the appellant is a departure sentence, Robinson v. State, 520 So.2d 1 (Fla.1988), but no reasons for departure were given. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Because the sentencing transcript reveals that the trial judge did not know that he was imposing a departure sentence, on remand he may consider a departure sentence. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989). The trial court is directed to give the appellant credit for all time served as of the date of resen-[775]*775tencing. See Brown v. State, 584 So.2d 209 (Fla.1991).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 596 So. 2d 774, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3913, 1992 WL 67929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 774 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. State
622 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)