Henderson v. State
557 So. 2d 690, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 1990 WL 25932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 So. 2d 743 →
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence, and find no error below except as to the trial court’s imposition of court costs against appellant without first making an assessment of his ability to pay those costs. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). That portion of the trial court’s order which requires appellant to pay court costs is reversed and remanded for a determination of appellant’s ability to pay those costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henderson v. State, 557 So. 2d 690, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 1990 WL 25932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 690 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Outar v. State
508 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)