Henderson v. State
This text of 557 So. 2d 690 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence, and find no error below except as to the trial court’s imposition of court costs against appellant without first making an assessment of his ability to pay those costs. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). That portion of the trial court’s order which requires appellant to pay court costs is reversed and remanded for a determination of appellant’s ability to pay those costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 690, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 1990 WL 25932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.