Henderson v. State
570 So. 2d 1150, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9449, 1990 WL 205449
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1990·No. No. 89-2623·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because of the variances between the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing and the provisions of the judgment and sentence and the order of probation, and because of the court’s express reliance on Heuring v. State, 539 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), we reverse and remand for resentencing in light of Heuring v. State, 559 So.2d 207 (Fla.1990), and so that the court may remedy the inconsistencies between the sentencing pronouncements and documentation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henderson v. State, 570 So. 2d 1150, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9449, 1990 WL 205449 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
570 So. 2d 1150 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bock
659 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)