Hawley v. . Powell

24 S.E.2d 523, 222 N.C. 713, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 411
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1943·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The discretionary action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict on the issue of damages because excessive or contrary to the weight of the evidence is not appealable in the absence of a denial of some legal right. C. S., 591; Anderson v. Holland, 209 N. C., 746, *714 184 S. E., 511; Bailey v. Dibbrell Mineral Co., 183 N. C., 525, 112 S. E., 29; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686. It was likewise a matter of discretion as to whether the verdict should be set aside in whole or in part. Geer v. Reams, 88 N. C., 197.

The defendants have preserved their exceptions to the trial on the first issue, and these may be presented on appeal from the final judgment, if, indeed, an appeal is taken therefrom. Thomas v. Carteret, 180 N. C., 109, 104 S. E., 75. No judgment has yet been entered in the cause. Hence, the present appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. Strayhorn v. Bank, 203 N. C., 383, 166 S. E., 312.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawley v. . Powell, 24 S.E.2d 523, 222 N.C. 713, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 411 (N.C. 1943).

24 S.E.2d 523 (Hawley v. . Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahrens v. Robey
102 S.E.2d 415 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
White v. Keller
86 S.E.2d 795 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Bumgardner v. Allison
78 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Muse v. Muse
66 S.E.2d 689 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Veazey v. City of Durham
57 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Edmunds v. . Allen
49 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Alligood Ex Rel. Alligood v. Shelton
32 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)