Hawley v. . Powell
This text of 24 S.E.2d 523 (Hawley v. . Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The discretionary action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict on the issue of damages because excessive or contrary to the weight of the evidence is not appealable in the absence of a denial of some legal right. C. S., 591; Anderson v. Holland, 209 N. C., 746, *714 184 S. E., 511; Bailey v. Dibbrell Mineral Co., 183 N. C., 525, 112 S. E., 29; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686. It was likewise a matter of discretion as to whether the verdict should be set aside in whole or in part. Geer v. Reams, 88 N. C., 197.
The defendants have preserved their exceptions to the trial on the first issue, and these may be presented on appeal from the final judgment, if, indeed, an appeal is taken therefrom. Thomas v. Carteret, 180 N. C., 109, 104 S. E., 75. No judgment has yet been entered in the cause. Hence, the present appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. Strayhorn v. Bank, 203 N. C., 383, 166 S. E., 312.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 S.E.2d 523, 222 N.C. 713, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawley-v-powell-nc-1943.