Ahrens v. Robey
This text of 102 S.E.2d 415 (Ahrens v. Robey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The discretionary ruling of the trial judge in setting aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of discretion. Here there is no evidence of such abuse. Therfore the appeal will be dismissed. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; In re Will of Hargrove, 207 N.C. 280, 176 S.E. 752; Hawley v. Powell, 222 N.C. 713, 24 S.E. 2d 523; Ward v. Cruse, 234 N.C. 388, 67 S.E. 2d 257; Williams v. Stumpf, 243 N.C. 434, 90 S.E. 2d 688.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E.2d 415, 248 N.C. 98, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahrens-v-robey-nc-1958.