Ahrens v. Robey
102 S.E.2d 415, 248 N.C. 98, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 332
Opinion
The discretionary ruling of the trial judge in setting aside the verdict as being contrary to the weight of the evidence is not reviewable on appeal in the absence of abuse of discretion. Here there is no evidence of such abuse. Therfore the appeal will be dismissed. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; In re Will of Hargrove, 207 N.C. 280, 176 S.E. 752; Hawley v. Powell, 222 N.C. 713, 24 S.E. 2d 523; Ward v. Cruse, 234 N.C. 388, 67 S.E. 2d 257; Williams v. Stumpf, 243 N.C. 434, 90 S.E. 2d 688.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ahrens v. Robey, 102 S.E.2d 415, 248 N.C. 98, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 332 (N.C. 1958).
102 S.E.2d 415 (Ahrens v. Robey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ward v. Cruse
67 S.E.2d 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Hawley v. . Powell
24 S.E.2d 523 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Goodman v. . Goodman
161 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
In Re Will of Hargrove
176 S.E. 752 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Williams v. Stumpf
90 S.E.2d 688 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)