Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank

203 N.C. 383
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 26, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The questions sought to be presented are not properly before us. Thomas v. Carteret, 180 N. C., 109, 104 S. E., 75.

So long as the matter was in fieri, the keeping of the verdict resided in the breast of the judge, and he was at liberty, at any time during the term, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to set it aside and to award a new trial, from which ruling no appeal lies. C. S., 591; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 794, 161 S. E., 688; Welch v. Hardware House, 202 N. C., 642, 163 S. E., 801; Smith v. Matthews, ante, 218; Bank v. Sanders, post, (Per curiam case.)

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank, 203 N.C. 383 (N.C. 1932).

203 N.C. 383 (Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sizemore v. Raxter
293 S.E.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Britt v. Allen
231 S.E.2d 607 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1977)
Hawley v. . Powell
24 S.E.2d 523 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)