Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank

203 N.C. 383
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 26, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 203 N.C. 383 (Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strayhorn v. Fidelity Bank, 203 N.C. 383 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The questions sought to be presented are not properly before us. Thomas v. Carteret, 180 N. C., 109, 104 S. E., 75.

So long as the matter was in fieri, the keeping of the verdict resided in the breast of the judge, and he was at liberty, at any time during the term, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to set it aside and to award a new trial, from which ruling no appeal lies. C. S., 591; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 794, 161 S. E., 688; Welch v. Hardware House, 202 N. C., 642, 163 S. E., 801; Smith v. Matthews, ante, 218; Bank v. Sanders, post, (Per curiam case.)

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sizemore v. Raxter
293 S.E.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Britt v. Allen
231 S.E.2d 607 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1977)
Hawley v. . Powell
24 S.E.2d 523 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.C. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strayhorn-v-fidelity-bank-nc-1932.