Edmunds v. . Allen
This text of 49 S.E.2d 416 (Edmunds v. . Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While there may have been some slight error in the trial, none appears on exceptive assignment of error which justifies another hearing. The controversy narrowed itself largely to issues of fact, determinable alone by the jury.
The motion to set aside the verdict for excessiveness was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on the showing here made. Hawley v. Powell, 222 N. C., 713, 24 S. E. (2d), 523; Johnston v. Johnston, 213 N. C., 255, 195 S. E., 807; Cole v. R. R., 211 N. C., 591, 191 S. E., 353; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 S.E.2d 416, 229 N.C. 250, 1948 N.C. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmunds-v-allen-nc-1948.