Hawkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hawkins v. State

398 S.W.3d 526, 2013 WL 542213, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 173

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hawkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 161 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. ED 98850·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Broderick Hawkins (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his motion to reopen his post-conviction proceedings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Broderick Hawkins (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his motion to reopen his post-conviction proceedings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hawkins v. State, 398 S.W.3d 526, 2013 WL 542213, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 173 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 526 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.