Hawkins v. State
386 S.W.3d 164, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2012 WL 5476822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hawkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 161 →
Opinion
ORDER
John Hawkins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary [165]*165hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Hawkins’ request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. State, 386 S.W.3d 164, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1423, 2012 WL 5476822 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
386 S.W.3d 164 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.