Hawkins v. State

360 S.W.3d 359, 2012 WL 706996, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 279

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Daniel Hawkins, Jr., appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment or Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing alleging that his Alford plea was involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligent because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).