Hawkins v. State
358 S.W.3d 588, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 171, 2012 WL 455209
Opinion
ORDER
Shemira Hawkins appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Hawkins’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. State, 358 S.W.3d 588, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 171, 2012 WL 455209 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
358 S.W.3d 588 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
358 S.W.3d 588 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)