Harrison v. United States
33 F. App'x 104
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2002·No. No. 01-8127·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Harrison, No. CR-99-513-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrison v. United States, 33 F. App'x 104 (4th Cir. 2002).
33 F. App'x 104 (Harrison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Masada v. Richstad
537 U.S. 1055 (Supreme Court, 2002)