Harrison v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Harrison v. United States

10 F. App'x 130

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 F. App'x 311 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2001·No. 00-7307·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his claim for damages under the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harrison v. United States, No. CA-99-513 BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his claim for damages under the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harrison v. United States, No. CA-99-513 BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harrison v. United States, 10 F. App'x 130 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

10 F. App'x 130 (Harrison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.