Harrison v. United States

28 F. App'x 311
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 2002
Docket01-7729
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 F. App'x 311 (Harrison v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. United States, 28 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darrol J. Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * Harrison v. United States, Nos. CR-92-446; CA-00-3877-2-18 (D.S.C. July 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Appellant’s Apprendi claim is not cognizable for this reason, in addition to those provided by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. United States
537 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. App'x 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-united-states-ca4-2002.