Harrison v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 F. App'x 311
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2002·No. 01-8127·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8127

LAWRENCE MICHAEL HARRISON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-513-BR)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Harrison, No.

CR-99-513-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. United States, (4th Cir. 2002).

Harrison v. United States (Harrison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.