Harrison v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8127
LAWRENCE MICHAEL HARRISON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-513-BR)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Harrison, No.
CR-99-513-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrison v. United States (Harrison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.