Harris v. State
111 S.E. 214, 28 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
Opinion
The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save tnat of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 111 S.E. 214, 28 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
111 S.E. 214 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adrian v. State
159 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Creech v. State
118 S.E. 501 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)