Creech v. State
118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 631, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 581
Opinions
“The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable 'hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.” Harris v. State, 28 Ga. App. 24-1 (111 S. E. 214). Penal Code, § 1010.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Creech v. State, 118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 631, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 581 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
118 S.E. 501 (Creech v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
111 S.E. 214 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)