Creech v. State
118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 631, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 581
This text of 118 S.E. 501 (Creech v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Creech v. State, 118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 631, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 581 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinions
“The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable 'hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.” Harris v. State, 28 Ga. App. 24-1 (111 S. E. 214). Penal Code, § 1010.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harris v. State
111 S.E. 214 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 501, 30 Ga. App. 631, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creech-v-state-gactapp-1923.