Harris v. State

111 S.E. 214, 28 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1922
Docket13117
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 214 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. State, 111 S.E. 214, 28 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

BloodwortH, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save tnat of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Broyles, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adrian v. State
159 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Creech v. State
118 S.E. 501 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 214, 28 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-gactapp-1922.