Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harris v. State

118 S.E. 405, 30 Ga. App. 344, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 447

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 463 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1923·No. 14453·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant in this case was convicted of violating sections 71Ó and 716 of the Penal Code, known as the “labor-contract law.” The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, and it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Blood worth, •/., concur. E. J. Lawrence, E. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error. Wade E. Watson, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant in this case was convicted of violating sections 71Ó and 716 of the Penal Code, known as the “labor-contract law.” The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, and it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Blood worth, •/., concur. E. J. Lawrence, E. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error. Wade E. Watson, solicitor, contra.

Harris v. State, 118 S.E. 405, 30 Ga. App. 344, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 447 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

118 S.E. 405 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.