Harris v. State
855 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14355, 2003 WL 22195223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 789 So. 2d 1114 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Kenneth Harris’ rule 3.800(a) motion, but remand for correction of the scoresheet error which resulted from the consolidation of Harris’ 1994 and 1999 offenses on a single scoresheet. See Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743, 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Ivy v. State, 754 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 855 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14355, 2003 WL 22195223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
855 So. 2d 674 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivy v. State
754 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Mortimer v. State
770 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)