Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harris v. State

Harris v. State

787 So. 2d 62, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2104, 2001 WL 193840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 713 So. 2d 1106 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4433·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying Buster Harris’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice to Harris’ right, if any, to file a rule 3.850 motion as to his one guidelines sentence. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc) (affirming without prejudice to filing a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea based upon a plea agreement wherein petitioner received the bottom of the 1995 guidelines).

Affirmed.

GREEN, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 787 So. 2d 62, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2104, 2001 WL 193840 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 62 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)